Tax Shelters, Non-Disclosure, Evasion: Does Romney Care About America?

An editorial from the New York Times underscores what most Americans are wondering: how much effort does Mitt Romney put in to evading paying capital gains taxes, and where does he keep his money anyway? Romney says that he has offshore money in “blind accounts,” meaning that he doesn’t know where his money is specifically invested. But he didn’t blindly put money into Bermuda and the Cayman islands. He chose those places because of their favorable tax policies — tax policies that hurt the United States. 

Mitt Romney offshore accounts

Pebble-free, seaweed-free, tax-free

Romney likens these tax evasion tactics to investing in foreign businesses. It’s strange then that he only invests in the foreign businesses that are located in places that do not tax foreign income, or places that do not have sizable markets like China or India or whose economic growth do not show promise such as Latin American or certain African nations. This also does not include foreign businesses who are operating in the United States by opening up offices and creating jobs. But more importantly, why is the Republican candidate for the President of the United States putting so much money offshore? Surely Mitt Romney is a job creator, and would want to see his money employing people and taking them off government assistance programs, right?

Wrong. Romney only cares about his money, which is why he puts it in the hands of personal wealth managers who navigate the tricky landscape of loopholes, breaks, and foreign capital regulation to effectively eliminate the payment of taxes and milk the system bone dry. These are the 1% that Occupy Wall Street was fighting against, and they get away with scamming the American public out of money earned in America — which should be taxed in America — every single day.

Romney is nothing more than their example, a rich man who has hid his earnings, released only one full tax report, does not disclose how he makes money ($27 million this past year) and who takes his money away from the reach of American tax collectors to increase his wealth by a few fractions of a percentage point at a time. Is this a guy who is standing up for America? Who is being truthful with the American people? The NYTimes summed it up nicely and gave it an important historical context that voters must face:

“What information he did release provides a fuzzy glimpse at a concerted effort to park much of his wealth in overseas tax shelters, suggesting a widespread pattern of tax avoidance unlike that of any previous candidate.”

The Sound Byte Era

If you are one of the many wondering why public political debates, both from politicians and passionate citizens, have become so polarized, so damaging, and so unproductive, you have the sound byte to thank. The sound byte has terrorized political arguments, because they can single-handedly take a politician hostage. They are simply too damaging.

context is king

Well, it used to be

A sentence is made up of letters and spaces. When arranged correctly, letters make up words, and these words carry meaning. Remove a few letters from a word and the meaning is lost. Words placed together in a certain way create a sentence. Sentences have meaning. Taking out words adjusts that meaning. A sound byte is precisely this; a part of a sentence or thought that is purposefully removed from its context for broadcasting and proliferation. Because attention spans are shortening like the Arctic ice-shelf, people try to communicate everything as quickly as possible, often at the expense of true understanding.

Context, which is fundamentally crucial to human understanding of language, can be removed by choice, and a sound byte can be repurposed. The demands of today’s media competition mean that anyone with editing technology (which is pretty much anyone) can take a few words from a speech or debate and provide a brand new context, thereby creating a story or a specific impression. While something like this should be illegal, it unfortunately is not.

The result: rational arguments which acknowledge the strengths of the opposite position are impossible today. A candidate or politician cannot be heard saying, “my opponent is right about this, that, and the other.” The candidate cannot actually work towards a real and possible solution based on compromise. If he or she does, all the media will take from it is “My opponent is right.”

Because of the above-mentioned factors, negativity has crushed optimism. It is much faster to say: “My opponent doesn’t know what he’s doing,” than to say “I agree with the following points, however I disagree with his approach to…” Instead of getting a constructive debate such as: “Candidate X is right about the problems with our immigration system, such as the cost of illegal immigrants on our health care system, but I feel that the answer lies in naturalization and not deportation,” we get “illegal immigrants are ruining our country and we must get rid of them.”

The technology that records everything and allows any amateur to become James Cameron is irreversible. News agencies will not stop cutting out sound bytes and spreading them around the public. So the change must come from the public itself to demand proper context for quotations and clips. We must retake our understanding, even if it takes a few more minutes.

Romney & Adult Bullying

Small tornadoes of dust were whipped up when allegations emerged that Mitt Romney had, in his days at upscale Detroit private school Cranbrook, been a bit of a bully. There was even a story of him, with a group of friends, holding down a student to cut off their longer — and we are to believe — more liberal hair. This is the wrong way to judge the Republican presidential candidate.

grade school bully

Why won't the Republicans just leave me alone?

Bullying in grade school is never acceptable, and should not be condoned. We have seen the frightful consequences of hazing and bullying taken too far. It hits a sore spot with parents because it happens in a place where students should be safe. Especially when the tuition tag has more zeros than the number of workers in Detroit’s auto industry. Sometimes though, kids are just dumb, and they are responding to social pressures that make them do things they normally wouldn’t do.

Mitt Romney should not be judged for his actions in high school. Who knows, the event might have been traumatic for him too, where his buddies led the craziness and he was also, in some way, a victim. The point is, nothing that came out about Romney had him acting alone. Nothing had him plotting to bully less fortunate kids, and if at anything, it reveals a side of life to him that he has been trying so unsuccessfully to portray: that he is not a robotic machine focused on profits.

Mitt Romney should be judged on his actions and achievements in his adult life. This is not the selection for the Dali Lama, it is a political competition. What we should be judging MItt Romney for is adult bullying.

Romney didn’t stand up for those with long hair in high school, but now he has a chance to stand up for groups that have been bullied constantly for their entire lives. He has the position to push forward civil rights, improve tolerance, and eradicate bullying on the adult level. To do this he has to take on his own party. Romney is better than the Republicans, this he knows. What remains to be seen is whether he will refuse to raze another’s head when there is a group of goons around him egging him on.