Republican Freedumbs

Republicans continually rail against any form of law or restriction that limits their ability to do as they like. At the same time, they fight tirelessly to restrict other groups, attempting to remove religious tolerance, freedom of expression, and women’s rights. Their dual definition of freedumb is harmful to our nation and exposes glaring hypocrisies in the GOP’s platform. Republicans do not favor smaller, less intrusive government; unless of course they are talking about smaller, less intrusive government for only themselves. 

Republican Faithful

The Republican Faithful

Here is a list of Republican freedumbs which in the end are not freedom at all, but dangerous double standards and beliefs that are untenable for a truly democratic society. But that doesn’t bother Republicans, they have never supported the idea of democracy, instead preferring to shovel-feed doctrine and laws down to the masses:

 

  • The freedumb to carry weapons anywhere; on school campuses for example, where we have all seen the type of carnage that arises.
  • The freedumb for corporations and people to spend as much money as they want to buy elections through advertising and smear campaigns, thereby eliminating a truly democratic process from ever existing again.
  • The freedumb to live in a country free of gay people by making sure that they can’t marry, make love, or express themselves.
  • The freedumb for men to decide what is best for women, in all cases, especially by expecting everyone to remain abstinent until marriage.
  • The freedumb of churches to remain out of the political sphere but able to spend as much money as they want influencing people on how to vote for secular policy.
  • The freedumb to profile anyone who looks like an immigrant and forcibly deport them if they are found without identification.
  • The freedumb for corporations to destroy our environment in the search for profits, regardless of the future cost of this disaster.
  • The freedumb to decide which type of science is taught in classrooms; that based on science or that based on belief.
  • The freedumb to go to war with other countries, under false pretexts, and then not have the leaders face any consequences.

The Self-Mockery Continues: The Unethical Amphibian

It was clear long before the Republican primaries started that Newt Gingrich would not do much to rattle tops of the electoral beech trees, after all, how could the man who personified the term “Washington Insider” promise to change anything about Washington? Yet in his hat went anyway, and now it appears that he wants it back before he officially drops out of the race. 

The Unethical Amphibian

Slippery as an amphibian, obscure as archegosauridae

No one better exemplifies Republican hypocrisy than Newt Gingrich, and now, for reasons that are very unclear, he has announced that he will drop out of the race next week. Originally he had hoped to stay in the game until August, to try and convince the Republican establishment at the Republican National Convention to disregard the entire democratic system and choose him instead. But a few bounced checks and daily marginalization later, he seems to finally be grasping the fact that both Republicans and America have never thought of him in this race as more than a tadpole.

However, bucking trends and surprising everyone again, he will drop out next week. The Wrong Wing discussed some of the possible reasons why he would stay in the race as he was clearly losing ground in the only area where he had potential, the south. Now there are probably a few different reasons for him announcing his announcement to drop out:

  1. His speechwriters jumped ship and he is searching for a new one so that he can eloquently explain why he thought that he could change anything about the America that he helped to create.
  2. He knows that as soon as he drops out officially, all of the remaining attention leaves, so he gets his name out there a few more times if he spreads out his dropping out.
  3. Like a smoker he is addicted to attention and thus found it necessary to say, “Yes, I know I need to quit, but I am going to start on Monday of next week, it’s easier that way.”
  4. He has a couple of dollars left and he intends to write those off before he drops out.

No matter what, the country will be very glad to see him go.

Republican Foreign Policy: A Giant Oxymoron

War is not the same as a strong defense, and when it comes to making decisions that affect the rest of the world, Republicans are hostile towards both our friends and enemies. They are belligerent towards allies who are hesitant to send their troops to die under false pretenses. And they are flaming tensions between countries that we should be working closely with, only because they are afraid of foreign competition and foreigners themselves.

World Map

You have to find Iran before you can bomb it

The push to make English an official language has as much effect as legislating laws to make it rain less. It arises from people who feel that America is losing its white Anglo-Saxon culture. These people blatantly forget that their ancestors came to America speaking other languages — most of them not that long ago — and they disregard how hard it is to learn a new language, something they will never do themselves. They forget that their immigrant ancestors probably never fully learned English; it was their children and their children’s children that learned it by default. All the hubbub only serves to heighten an already fiery xenophobia, and reduces America’s international image of openness and tolerance, probably our strongest asset.

Republicans also forget how big America is and how small other countries are in comparison. Smaller allies have limited military budgets and equipment, which is one of the reasons why America is so powerful, as we fill different needs i.e. patrolling international waters. But smaller military capability makes countries less hawkish, and much more reluctant to send troops overseas. America helps many nations to procure military materials through aid and training, but there is a permanent advantage to having American fulfill these duties. Picking fights with allies over their reluctance to go to war across the world reveals how little Republicans understand about the role of America.

There are two types of democracy, one that all democracies share and one that only America has now. The first is domestic democracy, a process by which each citizen has a voice regarding his or her concerns at home. The second is international democracy, which should be regulated by groups like the UN, but because of America’s highly involved role in the operations of other nations, the American electorate is thus influential in this regard too, without any sort of formal international training or even the smallest notion of what life is like in other places.

Furthermore, the ignorance that permeates the Republican base makes it downright irresponsible to have them contribute to foreign policy arguments. People that cannot even comprehend the issues facing our own country should be barred from exercising their opinions globally. Ask every Republican to locate Afghanistan on a map and you will find very few who can. This is troubling, and extremely frightening when people feel that Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, and Al-Qaeda are all different problems, even though they are completely inter-connected and dependant upon each other.

Just as a Republican gets upset when people in remote villages around the world make ignorant statements about America, so too does the rest of the world get upset when Republicans make ignorant statements. Making statements is one thing, but when those statements can lead to action, as happens in the case of America, there must be something to prevent the ignorance of our nation’s wrong wing from harming the delicate and, for the most part, peaceful balance of world order.

The Wrong Wing’s Gun Control Podcast

The Wrong Wing’s first Podcast is online. It discusses the Republican position on gun control, or more specifically, their opposition to it. Their arguments are nonsensical at best, lethal and recklessly dangerous at worst, and have created a culture of violence in the United States that must be addressed if we are to continue to progress as a nation.
April 2012 – 12 mins

And just in case you haven’t read it recently, the second amendment states:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

The GOP’s War On Women Is Nothing New

The uninhibited proliferation of bloody, international conflict-related terms continues to accelerate with the latest war, dubbed the War on Women. Republicans, and Mitt Romney in particular, are accused of being, at best, absent-minded and detached from women’s issues. At worst, they have been seen as being downright hostile towards the female population. Though the new term might be in its infancy, the war itself has been around since the beginning of recorded time.
women's rights

Rosie! We need you!

In ancient Athens, the pool in which the tadpole of democracy hatched, women were no more than part of the male household, like a slave or a chair. A woman could never actually become a citizen with political rights. Property was what mattered the most, and women rarely had any formal control. This is essentially what women would have to endure for the next two thousand years.

Women did not receive the right to vote anywhere until thousands of years later and on the opposite of the globe, in New Zealand. The land of sheep bucked the trend to carry the torch, providing women suffrage in 1893. Australia soon followed and then other developed countries began falling into place. The open talk of democracy that excluded half of its members proved too big a hypocrisy to continue.

The United States, no stranger to keeping large portions of its population excluded from their natural rights, was slow to respond. The women’s suffrage movement that eventually let to the 19th Amendment in 1920 took a lot of time to build and faced fierce opposition. Primarily this opposition came from southern land owners, and the very religious (sound like the GOP yet?) who were opposed on grounds of “principle” to keep women out of the political sphere.

But it was also practical; Republican positions have not been popular among women for the past century, and important democratic social programs like welfare and education are top priorities. Republicans have done everything they can to eliminate and strip resources away from the programs that women support the most. Luckily for us and our nation, women have continued to fight for these programs. But Republicans have continued to fight too, with Mississippi being the last state to ratify the 19th Amendment, in 1984.

The idea that the household is supposed to be male dominated has been extremely hard to shake, and to this day cultures around the world hide and limit their women. In Saudi Arabia, women can’t have a driver’s license. In Orthodox Jewish cultures, they cannot show any skin other than their faces and hands, and in Catholic communities women are barred from being a priest or leading a congregation.

Today, Republicans veil their disdain for women thinly, and when it comes to women’s reproductive rights, the GOP does appear to be like an army, marching forward under the banner of impossibly idealistic morality. The fight against providing women with access to birth control neglects the fact that it takes two people to procreate, and assumes that women should not be able to do as they please, or what pleases them. Forget being out of touch, Republicans are outwardly belligerent towards women, continuing the war against them by insisting on double standards and by returning to the age-old and completely incorrect assumption that a man knows best.

Let The Storm Begin: Romney vs. Obama

There has hardly been better news this entire year than the announcement by Rick “Well, that was difficult” Santorum that he would quit his campaign and not seek the Republican nomination for President. The skies opened and revealed gracious angels slowly restoring a touch of sanity to America that had been lost in the fiery fury of his ignorant positions and arguments. No one was happier than Mitt R. Money. 

Gabriel with jet engines

God's task force

Romney could not afford to be pulled to the right much longer, as the deeper he became entrenched in those “conservative” arguments, the harder it would be to veer back towards the center to face off against Obama (who the latest polls show having an 8% lead on Romney). Romney has flip-flopped more than a souvenir shop on Santa Monica beach, reversing his stances on all of the major issues at least once, if not multiple times, over his political career. It is one thing to change your mind after 10 years, it is another to pull an about-face over the course of weeks or months.

But Romney now faces an even bigger problem than Santorum, the Republicans themselves. Santorum, in all of his uneducated conservatism, presented Romney with a target to go after, a specific island on which to drop his campaign bombs. Now that Romney is presenting himself as speaking for all Republicans, he must do a very good job of sympathizing with the citizens who supported Santorum. These people do not like to read, which could be a good thing for Romney. It is good because they won’t research Romney’s past; finding out about his support of civil rights, helping the sick and poor, and working to control the spread of assault rifles. It is also good because these people are glued to their TVs (often because their legs are physically incapable of hefting around their globulous bodies further than the fridge) and are thus very susceptible to the type of negative advertising that Romney’s camp will be blasting over the airwaves.

The counter argument is that they have already written Romney off as out of touch with their concerns, not Christian enough (though how helping the sick and poor, and loving thy neighbor, no matter the color of their skin or sexual orientation, is not Christian is beyond The Wrong Wing, it seems we read the wrong Bible), and just another career politician who has only managed to maneuver his way to the top by agreeing with whatever is trendy at the time. Republicans are world-famous for being close-minded, often with absolutely no factual information for their positions, so getting them to open up a little to Romney will be the biggest challenge of this race. It would be naive to say that Romney should start praying now, he probably already has a nationwide prayer structure in place, with volunteers praying for him in each of the states, plus throwing out a few prayers for Allah and Krishna too. It can’t hurt.

 

 

Finally, a True Liberal Voice

Welcome to The Wrong Wing, this website is dedicated to those in America and around the world who are incapable of grasping the ignorance and hypocrisy of America’s Republicans and their political establishment today.

A liberal American

The Wrong Wing

It is meant to be a source of hope for those who can merely shake their heads in disbelief at some of the ridiculous things that Republicans say and believe. It is also designed to help those on the left to argue against Republicans by defeating their positions and revealing them for what they really are.

There is more at stake than just the outcome of an argument here, rationality and progressive ideas are being lost everyday to antiquated ideals of the past that never existed and never will exist. We must take action to stand up and say “No, Republicans, that’s not OK.”

It’s our future, we must fight to make it promising.

Obamacare and The Supreme Court

The hearings for and against the affordable care act opened in Washington D.C. At stake is the progress our nation has to address one of the largest issues facing us and our future. Forget about Obama’s legacy, forget about conservative vs. liberal, as a developed and rich country, the United States should, in some way, take care of its people. But for those out there who oppose the act, have no fear, the conservative Supreme Court will strike it down.

funeral for obamacare

Healthier than Obamacare

Ever since W Bush appoint Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court has regularly discarded the human condition and common sense in favor of a word by word literal definition of a document written over 200 years ago. While the Constitution is a revered parchment and has withstood the test of time, it was written to be changed. It was not meant to answer difficult questions such as: what happens when the cost of healthcare gets so high due to private systems, medical malpractice lawsuits, and insurance companies fighting to save every penny they can at the expense of the health of the people they are supposed to be providing care for? What happens when people can’t pay their medical bills, is it fair to tap the taxpayers who actually pay their bills? The point is simple, there is nothing in the Constitution that precludes these dilemmas.

Therefore, today, we find our court divided along ideological lines, with the wrong-wing justices attacking the bill and what it means related to the interstate commerce rulings, and with Justice Antonin “Stone Cold” Scalia going so far as to likening the health care law to forcing people to eat broccoli (something he ironically believes to be a bad thing, when plainly if people ate more broccoli and less chips this might not be so big an issue).

It is obvious here that the right of the court will find a way to act against the wellbeing of the citizens they are supposed to protect, without any regard to the dire consequences. One need only reference the campaign finance laws where the court ruled that companies can spend as much as they would like on whichever candidate they support, even though this is obviously not free speech, since the speech itself costs millions in TV and other advertising, something that normal individuals do not have. Instead of protecting a fair electoral process, i.e. one person one vote, the court ruled inexplicably for the right and business lobby.

Unsurprisingly, the court will rule against the healthcare act in June, negating the fragile process towards a healthier and better protected population, while, as is always the case, providing no alternative. This is unfair, it is unfair because people shoulder the entire costs or caring for everyone anyway, through higher insurance premiums for example, Obamacare is only a way to make sure that everyone is paying their fair share and the people who already pay their insurance and medical bills dont have to fork over an extra cent for their fellow citizens who are less responsible or at an economic disadvantage. That seems only just, yet the Supreme Court has forgotten that they are to represent objective justice for the people, not more partisan bickering.